MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
Abstract
prolapsus, the patien ts divided: сystocele – 21 (35%), сystourethrocele – 9 (15%), urethrocele – 3 (5%), vaginal prolapse – 6 (10%), uterine prolapse – 6 (10%), enterocele – 3 (5%), rectocele – 12 (20%). Measurements of the supporting structures were significant (p<.05) in the identification of pelvic floor laxity. The combined static and dynamic MRI can
provide useful information according certain structural abnormalities with specific disfunction, and could be necessary for surgeons as a complement method in planning operation technique.
About the Authors
M. N. BarinovaRussian Federation
A. E. Solopova
Russian Federation
N. V. Tupikina
Russian Federation
G. R. Kasyan
Russian Federation
D. Ju. Pushkar
Russian Federation
References
1. Boyadzhyan L., Raman S.S., Raz S. Role of static and dynamic MR Imaging in surgical pelvic floor dysfunction. Radiographics. 2008; (28): 949-967.
2. De Lancey J.O. The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 192 (5): 1488-1495.
3. Deval B., Haab F. What’s new in prolapsed surgery? Curr. Opin. Urol. 2003; 13: 315-323.
4. El Sayed R., Fielding J., El Mashed S., Morsy M., El Azim M. Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of female pelvic floor dysfunction: correlation with clinical findings. J. Women’s Imaging. 2005; 7: 163-80.
5. El Sayed R.F., El Mashed S., Farag A., Morsy M.M., Abdel Azim M.S. Pelvic floor dysfunction: assessment with combined analysis of static and dynamic MR imaging findings. Radiology. 2008; 248: 518-30.
6. Lakeman M.E., Zijta F.M., Peringa J., Nederveen A.J., Stoker J., Roovers J.P.W.R. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ prolapse: reliability of assessment and correlation with clinical findings and pelvic floor symptoms. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2012; 23 (11):1547-1554.
7. Macura K.J., Genadry R.R., Bluemke D.A. MR imaging of the female urethra and supporting ligaments in assessment of urinary incontinence: spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics. 2006; 26: 1135-49.
8. Nygaard I., Barber M.D., Burgio K.L., Kenton K., Meikle S., Schaffer J. et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA. 2008; 300 (11):1311-1316.
9. Stoker J., Rociu E., Bosch J.L. et al. Highresolution endovaginal MR imaging in stress urinary incontinence. Eur. Radiol. 2003;(13): 2031-7.
10. Tunn R., Goldammer K., Neymeyer J., Gauruder-Burmester A., Hamm B., Beyersdorff D. MRI morphology of the levator ani muscle, endopelvic fascia, and urethra in women with stress urinary incontinence. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2006. Jun 1; 126: 239-45.
Review
For citations:
Barinova M.N., Solopova A.E., Tupikina N.V., Kasyan G.R., Pushkar D.J. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2014;8(1):37-46. (In Russ.)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.