ULTRASONIC DIAGNOSIS OF INFERTILITY
Abstract
This article describes the present views on ultrasound diagnosis of infertility. The generalized data on modern techniques. Pressing questions of the most common causes of infertility.
About the Authors
I. O. Makarov
State Federal-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Vocational Training I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
T. V. Ovsyannikova
State Federal-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Vocational Training I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
T. V. Shemanaeva
State Federal-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Vocational Training I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. A. Kulikov
State Federal-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Vocational Training I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
T. D. Guriev
State Federal-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Vocational Training I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Гажонова В.Е., Терская Л.В., Савинова Е.Б. и др. Трехмерная эхография в выявлении причин женского бесплодия. Клин. вестн.2004; 1: 39-43.
2. Гребешева И.И., Камсюк Л.Г. Репродуктивное здоровье населения России. Планирование семьи. 2000; 3-4: 3-8.
3. Зубарев А.В. Новые ультразвуковые методики и эхоконтрастные препараты. Эхография. 2000; 1 (1): 41-44.
4. Зубарев А.В. Трехмерная и эхоконтрастная ангиография. Мед. виз. 1997; 4: 3-8.
5. Медведев М.В., Хохлин В.Л., Зыкин Б.И. Возможности эхогистероскопии в диагностике внутриматочной патологии. Ультразвуковая диагностика. 1998; 2: 35.
6. Медведев М.В., Хохлин В.Л., Озерская И.А. Эхогистеросальпингоскопия. Ультразвуковая диагностика. 1996; 2: 6-12.
7. Ньютон Д. Контрацепция в Европе: проблемы и перспективы. Планирование семьи. 1999; 1: 14-16.
8. Савельева Г.М., Блошанский Ю.М., Лобова Т.А. Репродуктивное здоровье населения г.Москвы и меры по его улучшению. Планирование семьи. 2000; 1: 3-5.
9. Сметник В.П., Тумилович Л.Г. Неоперативная гинекология: Руководство для врачей. 2-е изд. Кн. 1. СПб. 1995; 192-207.
10. Федорова Е.В., Липман А.Д., Омельяненко А.И. и др. Исследования маточного и яичникового кровотока у пациенток с бесплодием при лечении методами вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Исследование кровотока матки и эндометрия. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2002; 4: 126-135.
11. Чернова О.Ф., Рогачев А.А., Макарова О.В. и др. Ультразвуковая гидрогистерография как метод дифференциальной диагностики патологии эндометрия. Визуализация в клинике. 1997; 6: 42-46.
12. Эхография в акушерстве и гинекологии. Теория и практика. 6-е изд. в II частях. Ч. 1.Под ред. А. Флейшера, Ф. Мэнинга, П. Дженти, Р. Ромеро. Пер. с англ. М. 2005; 752 с; ил.
13. Эхография в акушерстве и гинекологии. Теория и практика. 6-е изд. в II частях. Ч. 2. Под ред. А. Флейшера, Ф. Мэнинга, П. Дженти, Р. Ромеро. Пер. с англ. М. 2004; 592 с; ил.
14. Battaglia C., Larocca E., Lanzani A. et al. Doppler ultrasound studies of the uterine arteries in spontaneous and IVF cycles. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 1990; 4: 245-250.
15. Chui D.K., Pugh N.D., Walker S.M. et al. Follicular vascularity: the predictive value of transvaginal power Doppler ultrasonography in an in-vitro fertilization programme: a preliminary study. Hum. Reprod. 1997; 12: 191-196.
16. Goswamy R., Steptoe P.C. Doppler ultrasound studies of the uterine artery in spontaneous ovarian cycles. Hum. Reprod. 1989; 3: 721-725.
17. Krysiewich S. Infertility in women: diagnostic evaluation with hysterosalpingography. AJR. 1992; 159: 253-261.
18. Kupesic S., Bekavac I., Bjelos D. et al. Assessment of endometrial receptivity by transvaginal color Doppler and threedimensional power Doppler ultrasonography in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization procedures. J. Ultrasound Med. 2001; 20: 125-134.
19. Kurijak A., Kupesic-Urek S., Shulman H. et al. Transvaginal color flow Doppler in the assessment of ovarian and uterine blood flow in infertile women. Fertil. Steril. 1991; 56: 870-874.
20. Kyei-Mensah A., Zaidi J., Pittrof R. et al. Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound: accuracy of follicular volume measurements Fertil. Steril. 1996; 65: 371-376.
21. Lass A., Skull J., McVeigh E. et al. Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrphin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Hum. Reprod. 1997; 12: 294-297.
22. Meyerowitz C.B., Fleischer A.C., Pickens D.R. et al. Quantification of tumor vascularity and flow with amplitude colour Doppler sonography in an experimental model. J. Ultrasound Med. 1996; 15: 827-833.
23. Pairleitner H., Steiner H., Hasenoehrl G. et al. Three-dimensioal power Doppler sonography: imaging and quantifying blood flow and vascularization. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 1999; 14: 139-143.
24. Raga F., Bonilla-Musoles F., Casan E.M. et al. Assessment of endometrial volume by threedimensional ultrasound prior to embryo transfer: Clues to endometrial receptivity. Hum. Reprod. 1999; 14 (11): 2851-2854.
25. Severi F.M. Controversies in Obstetrics and Gynecology. International Congress. Paris. 2001.
26. Sypor C.H., Willhoite A., Voorhis B.J. Ovarian volume: a novel outcome predictor for assisted reproduction. Fertil. Steril. 1995; 64: 1167-1171.
27. Wiesner W., Ruehm S., Bongartz G. Threedimensional dynamic MR hysterosalpingography a preliminary report. Eur. Radiology. 2001; 11: 1439-1444.
28. Wu M.H., Tang H.H., Hsu C.C. et al. The role of three-dimensional ultrasonographic images in ovarian measurement. Fertil. Steril. 1998; 69: 1152-1155.
29. Yang J.H., Wu M.Y., Chen C.D. et al. Association of endometrial blood flow as determined by a modified color Doppler technique with subsequent outcome in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 1999; 14: 1606-1610.
30. Yuval Y., Lipitz S., Dor J. et al. The relationships between endometrial thickness, and blood flow and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 1999; 14 (4): 1067-1071.
31. Zaidi J., Campbell S., Pittrof R. et al. Endometrial thickness, morphology, vascular penetration and velocitimetry in predicting implantation in an in-vitro fertilization program. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 1995; 6 (3): 191-198.
Review
For citations:
Makarov I.O., Ovsyannikova T.V., Shemanaeva T.V., Kulikov I.A., Guriev T.D. ULTRASONIC DIAGNOSIS OF INFERTILITY. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2013;7(2):20-22. (In Russ.)
Views: 392
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
