Preview

Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction

Advanced search

Early modeling of preterm birth risk using a biocollection of pregnancy samples created at different gestational stages according to the "longitudinal biobanking" strategy

https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2025.686

Abstract

Aim: to develop an algorithm for early modeling of high risk of preterm birth (PB) using a biocollection of pregnancy samples created according to the "longitudinal biobanking" strategy, based on clinical, proteomic, and transcriptomic data.

Materials and Methods. A prospective cohort study was conducted. Serum and plasma samples were retrieved dynamically from a biocollection during the first and second trimesters of gestation from 18 pregnant women with PB high risk developed cervical insufficiency (CI), and from 18 pregnant women with PB low risk not complicated by СI at any stage of gestation. Clinical and anamnestic predictors were analyzed, and serum relaxin and elastin levels, as well as marker microRNAs (hsa-miR-432-5p, hsa-miR-134-5p, hsa-miR-431-5p, hsa-miR-122-5, and hsa-miR-34a-5p) were quantitated.

Results. Based on the most significant clinical and anamnestic predictors, a proteomic predictor (serum relaxin level), and transcriptomic predictors (marker microRNAs expression) using a support vector machine (SVM), a predictive model was developed, which high efficiency was confirmed by ROC curves (AUC = 0.83 during training and 0.7 in cross-validation). This allows the developed classifier to be used as a tool for assessing PB risk.

Conclusion. Biocollections of pregnant women's samples, formed according to the "longitudinal biobanking" strategy, can serve as an effective platform for developing technologies for early predicted PB risk of obstetric complications.

About the Authors

O. V. Pachuliya
Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
Russian Federation

Olga V. Pachuliya, MD, PhD in Medicine.

Scopus Author ID: 57299197900.

WoS ResearcherID: Q-7819-2018. 

3 Mendeleevskaya Liniya, Saint Petersburg 199034



T. E. Lazareva
Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
Russian Federation

Tatyana E. Lazareva, MD.

Scopus Author ID: 58027876600.

WoS ResearcherID: JED-3900-2023. 

3 Mendeleevskaya Liniya, Saint Petersburg 199034



V. V. Khalenko
Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
Russian Federation

Vladislava V. Khalenko, MD.

Scopus Author ID: 57225139689.

WoS ResearcherID: JQW-2024-2023. 

3 Mendeleevskaya Liniya, Saint Petersburg 199034



R. A. Illarionov
Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
Russian Federation

Roman A. Illarionov, MD.

Scopus Author ID: 57222092111.

WoS ResearcherID: ABC-7970-2020. 

3 Mendeleevskaya Liniya, Saint Petersburg 199034



E. S. Vashukova
Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
Russian Federation

Elena S. Vashukova, MD, PhD in Biology.

Scopus Author ID: 56140637500.

WoS ResearcherID: D-3422-2017. 

3 Mendeleevskaya Liniya, Saint Petersburg 199034



T. B. Postnikova
Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
Russian Federation

Tatiana B. Postnikova, MD.

Scopus Author ID: 57299011900.

WoS ResearcherID: AGO-5589-2022. 

3 Mendeleevskaya Liniya, Saint Petersburg 199034



A. R. Maltseva
Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
Russian Federation

Anastasia R. Maltseva, MD. 

3 Mendeleevskaya Liniya, Saint Petersburg 199034



Yu. P. Milyutina
Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
Russian Federation

Yulia P. Milyutina, MD, Dr Sci Biol.

Scopus Author ID: 24824836300.

WoS ResearcherID: AAE-6182-2019. 

3 Mendeleevskaya Liniya, Saint Petersburg 199034



E. A. Kornushina
Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
Russian Federation

Ekaterina A. Kornushina, MD, PhD in Medicine.

Scopus Author ID: 57209398656.

WoS ResearcherID: K-4891-2018. 

3 Mendeleevskaya Liniya, Saint Petersburg 199034



O. N. Bespalova
Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
Russian Federation

Olesya N. Bespalova, MD, Dr Sci Med.

Scopus Author ID: 57189999252.

WoS ResearcherID: D-3880-2018. 

3 Mendeleevskaya Liniya, Saint Petersburg 199034



A. S. Glotov
Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology
Russian Federation

Andrey S. Glotov, MD, Dr Sci Biol.

Scopus Author ID: 7004340255.

WoS ResearcherID: E-8525-2015. 

3 Mendeleevskaya Liniya, Saint Petersburg 199034



References

1. Pokrovskaya M.S., Borisova A.L., Kiseleva A.V. et al. Role of biobanking in the development of personalized medicine in Russia and the world. [Rol` biobankirovaniya v razvitii personalizirovannoj mediciny v Rossii i v mire]. Kardiovaskulyarnaya terapiya i profilaktika. 2024;23(11):6–16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4214.

2. Pachulia O.V., Illarionov R.A., Vashukova E.S. et al. Strategies for bioresource collection in obstetrics: the experience of the "Genofund" biobank. [Strategii sozdaniya bioresursnyh kollekcij v akusherstve: opyt Biobanka "Genofond"]. Kardiovaskulyarnaya terapiya i profilaktika. 2024;23(11):4193. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4193.

3. Pachulia O.V., Illarionov R.A., Vashukova E.S. et al. Bioresource collection of biosamples from pregnant women at different gestational ages for the search for early biomarkers of pregnancy complications and potential for its use in research. [Harakteristika bioresursnoj kollekcii bioobrazcov ot beremennyh zhenshin na raznyh srokah gestacii dlya poiska rannih biomarkerov oslozhnenij beremennosti i perspektivy ee nauchnogo ispolzovaniya]. Kardiovaskulyarnaya terapiya i profilaktika. 2022;21(11):51–9. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3399.

4. Radzinsky V.E., Orazmuradov A.A., Savenkova I.V. et al. Preterm labour – an open problem of the XXI century. [Prezhdevremennye rody – nereshennaya problema XXI veka]. Kubanskij nauchnyj medicinskij vestnik. 2020;27(4):27–37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2020-27-4-27-37.

5. Di Renzo G.C. The great obstetrical syndromes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22(8):633–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050902866804.

6. Katkova N.Yu., Bodrikova O.I., Bezrukova I.M. et al. Clinical and anamnestic features of various types of preterm birth (a retrospective review). [Kliniko-anamnesticheskie osobennosti razlichnyh tipov prezhdevremennyh rodov (retrospektivnyj obzor)]. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya. 2017;26(3):70–6. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20202001154.

7. Bespalova O.N., Sargsyan G.S. The effectiveness of the obstetric pessary for threatening preterm birth and short cervix. [Effektivnost' primeneniya akusherskogo pessariya pri ugrozhayushchih prezhdevremennyh rodah i korotkoj shejke matki]. Medicinskij covet. 2017;(13):118–26. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2017-13-118-126.

8. Lamont F., Richardson L.S., Boniface J.J. et al. Commentary on a combined approach to the problem of developing biomarkers for the prediction of spontaneous preterm labor that leads to preterm birth. Placenta. 2020;98:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2020.05.007.

9. Meng L., Öberg S., Sandström A. et al. Identification of risk factors for incident cervical insufficiency in nulliparous and parous women: a population-based case-control study. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):348. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02542-7.

10. Shao M., Wang Sh., Ji T. et al. Study on the significance of serum relaxin and elastin expression in pregnant women with cervical insufficiency and its value in evaluating pregnancy outcomes. Progress in Modern Biomedicine. 2023:23(23):4596–600. https://doi.org/10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2023.23.039.

11. Elovitz M.A., Anton L., Bastek J., Brown A.G. Can microRNA profiling in maternal blood identify women at risk for preterm birth? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):782.e1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.023.

12. Winger E.E., Reed J.L., Ji X. et al. MicroRNAs isolated from peripheral blood in the first trimester predict spontaneous preterm birth. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0236805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236805.

13. Illarionov R.A., Kosyakova O.V., Vashukova E.S. et al. Collection of samples from women at different stages of pregnancy to search for early biomarkers of preterm birth. [Osobennosti sozdaniya kollektsii obraztsov beremennykh zhenshchin na raznykh srokakh gestatsii dlya poiska rannikh biomarkerov prezhdevremennykh rodov]. Kardiovaskulyarnaya terapiya i profilaktika. 2020;19(6):2708. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2020-2708.

14. Clinical guidelines – Isthmic-cervical insufficiency – 2024-2025-2026 (03.09.2024). [Klinicheskie rekomendacii – Istmiko-cervikal'naya nedostatochnost' – 2024-2025-2026 (03.09.2024). Moscow: Ministerstvo zdravoohraneniya Rossijskoj Federacii, 2024. 26 p. (In Russ.). Available at: https://base.garant.ru/409612135. [Accessed: 05.09.2025].

15. Cnattingius S., Villamor E., Johansson S. et al. Maternal obesity and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA. 2013;309(22):2362–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.6295.

16. Maraka S., Ospina N.M.S., O'Keeffe D.T. et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2016;26(4):580–90. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0418.

17. Consortium on Thyroid and Pregnancy – Study Group on Preterm Birth; Korevaar T.I.M., Derakhshan A., Taylor P.N. et al. Association of thyroid function test abnormalities and thyroid autoimmunity with preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2019;322(7):632–41. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.10931.

18. Hiltunen L.M., Laivuori H., Rautanen A. et al. Factor V Leiden as a risk factor for preterm birth: a population-based nested case-control study. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9(1):71–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04104.x.

19. Iordache O., Anastasiu D.M., Kakarla M. et al. Influence of antiphospholipid antibody-associated thrombophilia on the risk of preterm birth: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(16):5316. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165316.

20. Wang E., Tang P., Chen C. Urinary tract infections and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2024;66:e54. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-9946202466054.

21. Qin J., Liu X., Sheng X. et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):73–85.e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.007.

22. Wu C.Q., Nichols K., Carwana M. et al. Preterm birth after recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(4):811–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.004.

23. Yu J.Y., Jiang B., Zhang X.J. et al. History of induced abortion and the risk of preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023;36(1):2207114. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2023.2207114.

24. Lin D., Fan D., Wu S. et al. Risk factors for premature rupture of membranes in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2024;14(3):e077727. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077727.

25. Saccone G., Perriera L., Berghella V. Prior uterine evacuation of pregnancy as independent risk factor for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(5):572–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.044.

26. Qin Z.J., Xu Y., Du Y. et al. Intrauterine hematoma in the first trimester and pregnancy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. 2022;9:892146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.892146.

27. Morales-Prieto D.M., Chaiwangyen W., Ospina-Prieto S. et al. MicroRNA expression profiles of trophoblastic cells. Placenta. 2012;33(9):725–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2012.06.007.

28. Murrieta-Coxca J.M., Barth E., Fuentes-Zacarias P. et al. Identification of altered miRNAs and their targets in placenta accreta. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1021640. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1021640.

29. Liu Y., Li L., Feng T. et al. Abnormal miR-122-5p expression in decidual NK cells and its impact on trophoblast behavior: insights into unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Int J Med Sci. 2024;21(14):2824–36. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.101865.

30. Sun M., Chen H., Liu J. et al. MicroRNA-34a inhibits human trophoblast cell invasion by targeting MYC. BMC Cell Biol. 2015;16:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-015-0068-2.


Review

For citations:


Pachuliya O.V., Lazareva T.E., Khalenko V.V., Illarionov R.A., Vashukova E.S., Postnikova T.B., Maltseva A.R., Milyutina Yu.P., Kornushina E.A., Bespalova O.N., Glotov A.S. Early modeling of preterm birth risk using a biocollection of pregnancy samples created at different gestational stages according to the "longitudinal biobanking" strategy. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2025.686

Views: 27


ISSN 2313-7347 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3194 (Online)