Recurrent thrombosis in malignant neoplasms: clinical significance of long-term anticoagulant prophylaxis
https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2025.629
Abstract
Aim: to stratify the risk of thrombosis and assess frequency of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding during long-term anticoagulant therapy (АСТ) in patients with stage III–IV ovarian cancer (ОС).
Materials and Methods. A prospective interventional comparative non-randomized study was conducted by enrolling 126 patients with stage III–IV ОС, of whom 66 had VTE and received long-term АСТ for 60–72 months, whereas 60 subjects comprised comparison group without thrombotic complications. Risk stratification was performed using the Khorana, Vienna-CATS, and Tic-Onco scales. The frequency of VTE recurrence and bleeding as well as the prognostic significance of the above noted scales were assessed.
Results. It was found that recurrent VTE (deep vein thrombosis – in 12.1 %, pulmonary embolism – in 6.1 %) developed in 18.2 % of patients receiving anticoagulants, so that two thirds of cases occurred within the first year of therapy. In comparison group, VTE incidence was 16.7 %. Major bleeding was recorded in 6.1 % patients, clinically significant moderate bleeding – in 21.2 % cases. The Vienna-CATS (AUC = 0.719) and Tic-Onco (AUC = 0.730) scales demonstrated better predictive ability compared to Khorana model (AUC = 0.671).
Conclusion. 60–72-month-long АСТ in patients with high thrombotic risk allows to significantly reduce the frequency of VTE recurrence with acceptable level of hemorrhagic complications and can be considered as a preferred strategy for secondary prevention in active oncological processes.
About the Authors
A. V. VorobеvRussian Federation
Alexander V. Vorobev, MD, PhD
Scopus Author ID: 57191966265
Wos ResearcherID: F-8804-2017
8 bldg. 2, Trubetskaya Str., Moscow 119048
A. G. Solopova
Russian Federation
Antonina G. Solopova, MD, Dr Sci Med, Prof.
Scopus Author ID:6505479504
Wos ResearcherID: Q-1385-2015
8 bldg. 2, Trubetskaya Str., Moscow 119048
N. V. Lomakin
Russian Federation
Nikita V. Lomakin, MD, Dr Sci Med, Prof.
15 Marshala Timoshenko Str., Moscow 121359
2/1 Barrikadnaya Str., Moscow 125993
V. O. Bitsadze
Russian Federation
Victoria O. Bitsadze, MD, Dr Sci Med, Prof., Professor RAS
Scopus Author ID: 6506003478
WoS ResearcherID: F-8409-2017
8 bldg. 2, Trubetskaya Str., Moscow 119048
M. V. Kim
Russian Federation
Milana V. Kim
8 bldg. 2, Trubetskaya Str., Moscow 119048
K. N. Grigoreva
Russian Federation
Kristina N. Grigoreva, MD, PhD
8 bldg. 2, Trubetskaya Str., Moscow 119048
K. V. Gadatskaia
Russian Federation
Karina V. Gadatskaia
1 Ostrovityanovа Str., Moscow 117513
V. N. Galkin
Russian Federation
Vsevolod N. Galkin, MD, Dr Sci Med, Prof.
4 Kolomensky Proezd, Moscow 115446
D. O. Utkin
Russian Federation
Dmitry O. Utkin, MD, PhD
4 Kolomensky Proezd, Moscow 115446
I. Elalamy
France
Ismail Elalamy, MD, Dr Sci Med, Prof.
Scopus Author ID: 7003652413
WoS ResearcherID: AAC-9695-2019
8 bldg. 2, Trubetskaya Str., Moscow 119048
12 Rue de l’École de Médecine, Paris 75006
4 Rue de la Chine, Paris 75020
A. D. Makatsariya
Russian Federation
Alexander D. Makatsariya, MD, Dr Sci Med, Prof., Academician of RAS
Scopus Author ID: 57222220144
WoS ResearcherID: M-5660-2016
8 bldg. 2, Trubetskaya Str., Moscow 119048
References
1. Becattini C., Di Nisio M., Franco L. et al. Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: the dark side of the moon. Cancer Treat Rev. 2021;96:102190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102190.
2. Cohen A., Lim C.S., Davies A.H. Venous thromboembolism in gynecological malignancy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27(9):1970–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000001111.
3. Salinaro J.R., McQuillen K., Stemple M. et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism among patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020;30(4):491–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-000980.
4. Moufarrij S., Sassine D., Basaran D., Jewell E.L. Assessing the need for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis at the time of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: a literature review. Gynecol Oncol. 2023;170:167–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.012.
5. Marques I.S., Tavares V., Savva-Bordalo J. et al. Long non-coding RNAs: bridging cancer-associated thrombosis and clinical outcome of ovarian cancer patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;25(1):140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010140.
6. Deryabina V.A., Matukhin V.I., Rukhliada N.N. et al. Risks of thrombotic complications in patients with ovarian cancer and some safety aspects of using antifibrinolytic hemostatic agents. [Riski tromboticheskih oslozhnenij u pacientov s rakom yaichnikov i nekotorye aspekty bezopasnosti primeneniya antifibrinoliticheskih gemostaticheskih sredstv]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2023;(10):60–9. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2023.107.
7. Han L., Chen Y., Zheng A., Chen H. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients with ovarian cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Am J Cancer Res. 2023;13(5):2126–34.
8. Grigoreva К.N., Gashimova N.R., Tsibizova V.I. Hemostasis correction in the treatment and rehabilitation of COVID-19 patients. [Korrekciya gemostaza v lechenii i reabilitacii pacientov s COVID-19]. Journal of Medical Rehabilitation. 2023;1(1):49–59. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2949-5873/rehabil.2023.3.
9. Levi M. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in cancer: an update. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2019;45(4):342–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1687890.
10. Khorana A.A., Kuderer N.M., Culakova E. et al. Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood. 2008;111(10):4902–7. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-10-116327.
11. Khorana A.A., Mackman N., Falanga A. et al. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022;8(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-022-00336-y.
12. Ay C., Dunkler D., Marosi C. et al. Prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. Blood. 2010;116(24): 377–82. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-02-270116.
13. Mart?n A.J.M., Ortega I., Font C. et al. Multivariable clinical-genetic risk model for predicting venous thromboembolic events in patients with cancer. Br J Cancer. 2018;118(8):1056–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0027-8.
14. Schulman S., Makatsariya A.D., Vorobev A.V. et al. Malignant neoplasms and thromboses. [Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniya i trombozy]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2019;(7):14–23. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.7.14-23.
15. Petrikov А.S., Vavilova Т.V., Vardanyan А.V. et al. Primary prevention of venous thromboembolism with low molecular weight heparins in surgical patients – 2024: Council of Experts resolution. [Pervichnaya profilaktika venoznyh tromboembolicheskih oslozhnenij nizkomolekulyarnymi geparinami u hirurgicheskih pacientov – 2024: rezolyuciya Soveta ekspertov]. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2024;17(2):251–78. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2024.250.
16. Fujisaki T., Sueta D., Yamamoto E. et al. Comparing anticoagulation strategies for venous thromboembolism associated with active cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC CardioOncol. 2024;6(1):99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.10.009.
17. Talmor-Barkan Y., Yacovzada N.-S., Rossman H. et al. Head-to-head efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran in an observational nationwide targeted trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022;9(1):26–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac063.
18. Cohen A.T., Hamilton M., Mitchell S.A. et al. Comparison of the novel oral anticoagulants apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in the initial and long-term treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144856.
19. Farge D., Frere C., Connors J.M. et al.; International Initiative on Thrombosis and Cancer (ITAC) advisory panel. 2022 international clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer, including patients with COVID-19. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(7):e334–e347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00160-7.
20. Key N.S., Khorana A.A., Kuderer N.M. et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: ASCO Guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16):3063–71. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.00294.
21. Barca-Hernando M., Lopez-Ruz S., Marin-Romero S. et al. Comparison of long-term complications in cancer patients with incidental and acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1118385. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1118385.
22. Lanting V.R., Takada T., Bosch F.T.M. et al. Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis and development of a prediction model. Thromb Haemost. 2024 Oct 16. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2418-3960.
23. Khorana A.A., McCrae K.R., Milentijevic D. et al. Duration of anticoagulant therapy and VTE recurrence in patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(10):3833–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-4661-3.
24. Dave H.M., Khorana A.A. Management of venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer. Cleve Clin J Med. 2024;91(2):109–17. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.91a.23017.
25. Moik F., Colling M., Mah? I. et al. Extended anticoagulation treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis-Rates of recurrence and bleeding beyond 6 months: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemost. 2022;20(3):619–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.15599.
26. Khizroeva J.Kh., Aslanova Z.D., Solopova A.G. et al. The role of neutrophil extracellular traps in cancer progression and thrombosis development. [Rol' vnekletochnyh lovushek nejtrofilov v progressii raka i razvitii trombozov]. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2024;18(1):55–67. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2024.475.
27. Vorobev A.V., Einullaeva S.E., Borodulin A.S. et al. COVID-19 impact on thrombotic complications in cancer patients. [Vliyanie COVID-19 na tromboticheskie oslozhneniya u onkologicheskih bol'nyh]. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2024;18(3):286–99. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2024.519.
28. Vorobеv A.V., Solopova A.G., Bitsadze V.O. et al. Comparative estimation of the effectiveness of the Khorana, Vienna CATS, and TiC-Onco scores and the vWF/ADAMTS13 ratio in identifying a high risk of thrombotic complications in patients with malignant neoplasms. [Sravnenie effektivnosti shkal Khorana, Vienna CATS, TiC-Onco i sootnosheniya vWF/ADAMTS13 v vyyavlenii vysokogo riska tromboticheskih oslozhnenij u bol'nyh zlokachestvennymi novoobrazovaniyami]. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2025;18(1):71–9. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2025.308.
29. Bertoletti L., Girard P., Elias A. et al., INNOVTE CAT Working Group. Recurrent venous thromboembolism in anticoagulated cancer patients: diagnosis and treatment. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2024;117(1):84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2023.11.006.
30. Fedotkina Yu.A., Panchenko E.P. Modern approaches to the prevention of venous thromboembolic complications in patients with active cancer. [Sovremennye podhody k profilaktike venoznyh tromboembolicheskih oslozhnenij u pacientov s aktivnym rakom]. Aterotromboz. 2022;12(2):44–62. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21518/2307-1109-2022-12-2-44-62.
31. Patell R., Hsu C., Shi M. et al. Impact of mild thrombocytopenia on bleeding and recurrent thrombosis in cancer. Haematologica. 2024;109(6):1849–56. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2023.284192.
What is already known about this subject?
► Cancer patients have a markedly higher risk of venous thromboembolic complications (VTE) compared to the general population, especially in the presence of metastases and undergoing antitumor therapy.
► A number of clinical scales and biomarkers have been used to predict VTE recurrence, but none of the models provides a fully individualized approach.
► The duration of anticoagulant therapy (ACT) for recurrent VTE in patients with malignant tumors remains a matter of debate, especially following the standard first six months of treatment.
What are the new findings?
► Vienna-CATS and Tic-Onco scales have high discriminatory ability in assessing the long-term risk of thrombosis recurrence in cancer patients.
► Personalized ACT lasting more than 5 years effectively prevents recurrent VTE in high-risk patients without prominently increasing risk of bleeding.
► A personalized algorithm for ACT in patients with oncological diseases, based on a combination of clinical and hematological data, D-dimer levels, assessment of renal function and presence of genetic thrombophilia forms, allows not only to optimize safety of therapy, but also to increase its effectiveness upon long-term use.
How might it impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?
► The use of the Vienna-CATS and Tic-Onco scales in routine practice will allow more precisely identify patients requiring long-term prophylaxis, including those who were not previously classified as high risk according to the Khorana scale.
► The study results may contribute to revising ACT timing in cancer patients with high risk of recurrent thrombosis in favor of extending it.
► Integration of thrombophilia genetic testing into risk assessment algorithms may become a standard for choosing a strategy for long-term ACT in oncology.
Review
For citations:
Vorobеv A.V., Solopova A.G., Lomakin N.V., Bitsadze V.O., Kim M.V., Grigoreva K.N., Gadatskaia K.V., Galkin V.N., Utkin D.O., Elalamy I., Makatsariya A.D. Recurrent thrombosis in malignant neoplasms: clinical significance of long-term anticoagulant prophylaxis. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2025;19(2):168-179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2025.629

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.