Preview

Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction

Advanced search

Optimization of intrauterine interventions in spontaneous abortion

https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2024.522

Abstract

Introduction. Retained products of conception (RPOC) are detected in 15 % of women after spontaneous or medical abortion. RPOC blind removal from the uterine cavity remains the "gold standard" of surgical treatment, which, however, may be associated with a high risk of certain complications that pose a serious threat to female reproductive function and quality of life. An alternative method for eliminating RPOC proposed by operative hysteroscopy demonstrating the visual control advantages.

Aim: to evaluate clinical effectiveness and safety of RPOC removal in incomplete spontaneous abortion using hysteroscopic morcellation.

Materials and Methods. The prospective comparative study included 135 women with incomplete spontaneous abortion aged 18 to 40 years, divided into 3 groups: group 1 – 42 patients after RPOC electromechanical vacuum aspiration (EVA); group 2 – 44 patients after RPOC manual vacuum aspiration (MVA); group 3 – 49 patients after RPOC hysteroscopic morcellation (HM). In all patients, the level of total endotoxin was measured, metroaspirate cytokine profile was analyzed, the indicator of endometrial microcirculation was assessed before surgical treatment and on day 1 afterwards, and genital ultrasound examination was performed on day 3–5 post-surgery.

Results. In the post-surgical vs. pre-treatment period, the EVA and MVA groups revealed significantly increased levels of total endotoxin and interleukin (IL) IL-1β (p < 0.05). In contrast, these parameters in the HM group changed insignificantly (p > 0.05). In all groups, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) levels after surgery were significantly elevated (p = 0.001). In the EVA and MVA groups, levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-4 and IL-10 were markedly decreased (p = 0.001), which did not change in the HM group (p > 0.05). A significantly accelerated microcirculation rate was noted in the EVA and MVA groups while comparing it at pre-surgery level (p = 0.001), but not in the HM group (p = 0.415). Incomplete RPOC removal was reported for 4.5 % MVA patients, all EVA and HM patients had total RPOC elimination. Intraoperative bleeding, uterine perforation were not reported in any examined patient.

Conclusion. The early-stage treatment results showed that RPOC removal by the HM is an effective and safe approach. Limited inflammatory response and stable endometrial microcirculation upon using the HM evidence about a minimal impact on the endometrium that lowers probability of postoperative adhesion.

About the Authors

I. A. Salov
Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Igor A. Salov – MD, Dr Sci Med, Professor, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of General Medicine, Director of the University Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology

112 Bolshaya Kazachya Str., Saratov 410012



I. V. Naumova
Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Iuliia V. Naumova – MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of General Medicine

112 Bolshaya Kazachya Str., Saratov 410012



M. V. Lomovitskaya
Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Marina V. Lomovitskaya – MD, Clinical Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of General Medicine

112 Bolshaya Kazachya Str., Saratov 410012



References

1. Guarino A., Di Benedetto L., Assorgi C. et al. Conservative and timely treatment in retained products of conception: a case report of placenta accreta ritention. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(10):13625–9. 2

2. . Sharma D.P., Choudhary D.V., Rahariya D.P. Overview of retained products of conception and its management. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2017;16(4):70–5. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1604087075.

3. Smorgick N., Barel O., Fuchs N. et al. Hysteroscopic management of retained products of conception: meta-analysis and literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;173:19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.11.020.

4. Sutherland N.S.V., Rajesh H. The intrauterine Bigatti Shaver System: an alternative option for focal retained products of conception. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018;2018:1536801. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1536801.

5. Foreste V., Gallo A., Manzi A. et al. Hysteroscopy and retained products of conception: an update. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021;10(4):203–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_125_20.

6. Munros J., Gracia M., Nonell R. et al. Delayed hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception is associated with spontaneous expulsion. SRL Reprod Med Gynecol. 2017;3(1):024–028.

7. Hooker A.B., Thurkow A. Asherman’s syndrome after removal of placenta remnants: a serious clinical problem. Gynecol Surg. 2011;8(4):449–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-011-0677-5.

8. Nanda K., Lopez L.M., Grimes D.A. et al. Expectant care versus surgical treatment for miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(3):CD003518. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003518.pub3.

9. Klement A.H., Frederic M., Bentov Y. et al. Oral contraceptive pills as an option for non-surgical management of retained products of conception – a preliminary study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018;34(7):609–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2018.1427714.

10. Stewart K.T., Lee J.S., Pan K. et al. Outcome of using vaginal misoprostol for treatment of retained products of conception after first trimester miscarriage: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020;25(6):474–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2020.1807498.

11. Alonso L., Nieto L., Carugno J. Hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception implanted over a focal area of adenomyosis: a case report. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(3):382–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.010.

12. Hamerlynck T.W., Blikkendaal M.D., Schoot B.C. et al. An alternative approach for removal of placental remnants: hysteroscopic morcellation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(6):796–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.04.024.

13. Ben-Ami I., Melcer Y., Smorgick N. et al. A comparison of reproductive outcomes following hysteroscopic management versus dilatation and curettage of retained products of conception. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;127(1):86–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.05.003.

14. Capmas P., Lobersztajn A., Duminil L. et al. Operative hysteroscopy for retained products of conception: efficacy and subsequent fertility. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(3):151–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.12.005.

15. Jansen F.W., Vredevoogd C.B., van Ulzen K. et al. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(2):266–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00865-6.

16. Gambadauro P., Gudmundsson J., Torrejón R. Intrauterine adhesions following conservative treatment of uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:853269. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/853269.

17. Mallick R., Middleton B. The use of hysteroscopic morcellation in the outpatient management of retained products of conception. Res Rep Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;1(1):15–7. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27125.17128.

18. Hamerlynck T.W., van Vliet H.A., Beerens A.S. et al. Hysteroscopic morcellation versus lLoop resection for removal of placental remnants: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(7):1172–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.828.

19. Clinical guidelines – Miscarriage (spontaneous abortion) – 2021-2022- 2023 (19.01.2023). [Klinicheskie rekomendacii – Vykidysh (samoproizvol'nyj abort) – 2021-2022-2023 (19.01.2023)]. Moscow: Ministerstvo zdravoohraneniya Rossijskoj Federacii, 2023. 25 p. (In Russ.). Available at: http://disuria.ru/_ld/12/1232_kr21O02O05MZ.pdf. [Accessed: 31.03.2024].

20. Warembourg S., Huberlant S., Garric X. et al. Prevention and treatment of intra-uterine synechiae: review of the literature. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015;44(4):366–79. (In French). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.10.014.

21. Thiruchelvam U., Dransfield I., Saunders P.T., Critchley H.O. The importance of the macrophage within the human endometrium. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;93(2):217–25. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0712327.

22. Ge Y., Huang M., Zhu X.M., Yao Y.M. Biological functions and clinical implications of interleukin-34 in inflammatory diseases. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2020;119:39–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apcsb.2019.02.003.

23. Wang J., Li D., Pan Y. et al. Interleukin-34 accelerates intrauterine adhesions progress related to CX3CR1+ monocytes/macrophages. Eur J Immunol. 2021;51(10):2501–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.202149174.

24. Wang Z.N., Wang M.S., Xi X. Clinical evidence of positive correlation between intrauterine adhesions and chronic endometritis: a retrospective study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(10):4601–7. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202305_32467.

25. Hooker A.B., Aydin H., Brölmann H.A.M., Huirne J.A.F. Long-term complications and reproductive outcome after the management of retained products of conception: a systematic review. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):156–64e1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.021.

26. Tam T., Estes S.J. Hysteroscopic morcellator used in the diagnosis and evacuation of retained products of conception. J Gynecol Surg. 2013;29(6):332–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2013.0038.

27. Petrozza J. Removal of retained products of conception using a hysteroscopic morcellator: a safer alternative. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(6):S1–S235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.489.

28. Ansari S.H., Bigatti G., Aghssa M.M. Operative hysteroscopy with the Bigatti shaver (IBS®) for the removal of placental remnants. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018;10(3):153–9.


What is already known about this subject?

► Retained products of conception (RPOC) are detected in 10–15 % of patients after spontaneous or medical abortion.

► In RPOC treatment "blind" intrauterine intervention remains "gold standard".

► "Blind" RPOC removal is often associated with the development of certain complications that pose a serious threat to female fertility and quality of life.

What are the new findings?

► The results of comparatively analyzed application of hysteroscopic morcellation (НМ) and RPOC "blind" vacuum aspiration are presented.

► Based on analyzing markers of inflammatory response, endometrial microcirculation in the early post-surgical period, conclusions about the minimum НМ damaging effect on the endometrium, were made able to lower the probability of postoperative adhesion.

How might it impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?

► НМ is an effective and safe means to eliminate RPOC and may be a preferred alternative for "blind" intrauterine interventions.

Review

For citations:


Salov I.A., Naumova I.V., Lomovitskaya M.V. Optimization of intrauterine interventions in spontaneous abortion. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2024;18(3):352-364. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2024.522

Views: 503


ISSN 2313-7347 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3194 (Online)