Preview

Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction

Advanced search

Transcriptomic profile assessment for preeclampsia prediction and early diagnostics

https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2024.521

Abstract

Aim: to develop a model for predicting preeclampsia (PE) based on the clinically most significant differentially expressed plasma microRNAs.

Materials and Methods. A prospective observational comparative study was conducted with 62 women, divided into two parallel groups: 32 patients with PE and 30 clinically healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancy. Transcriptomic analysis was performed to identify differentially expressed blood plasma microRNAs using next generation sequencing (NGS).

Results. Calculation of risk ratios for PE development allowed to identify 14 plasma microRNAs that influence the development of PE pathology. PE-associated microRNAs hsa-miR-103a-3p, hsa-miR-451a and hsa-miR-516a-5p have a high diagnostic value when combined to assess their blood plasma expression level in early pregnancy stages.

Conclusion. The developed prognostic model can be applied to pregnant women at risk for PE development, which may further reduce obstetric complications and improve perinatal outcomes.

About the Authors

A. V. Melnik
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Anastasia V. Melnik – 6th year Student, 2nd Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



V. E. Solovyova
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Valeria E. Solovyova – 6th year Student, 1st Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



Yu. O. Yatsenko
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Yulia O. Yatsenko – 6th year Student, 2nd Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



A. E. Filippova
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Anna E. Filippova – 6th year Student, 2nd Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



E. G. Asryan
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Elen G. Asryan – 6th year Student, 2nd Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



T. Е. Seitumerov
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Tair Е. Seitumerov – 6th year Student, 2nd Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



E. R. Myshak
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Elena R. Myshak – 6th year Student, 1st Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



Yu. A. Chernysheva
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Yulia A. Chernysheva – 6th year Student, 1st Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



S. A. Ziyadinova
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Sevilya A. Ziyadinova – 6th year Student, 1st Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



V. O. Kononenko
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Vladislava O. Kononenko – 6th year Student, 1st Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



M. R. Kadyrova
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Medine R. Kadyrova – 6th year Student, 1st Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



A. A. Denisenko
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Alina A. Denisenko – 6th year Student, 1st Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



K. T. Ismagilova
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Karina T. Ismagilova – 6th year Student, 2nd Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



D. V. Mushinsky
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Daniil V. Mushinsky – 6th year Student, 2nd Medical Faculty, Order of the Red Banner of Labor of Georgievsky Medical Institute

5/7 Lenin Avenue, Simferopol 295051



L. E. Sorokina
Academician Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Health Ministry of Russian Federation; Medical center in Kolomenskoye CJSC
Russian Federation

Leya E. Sorokina – MD, Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Cytology, Academician Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perina- tology; Allergist-Immunologist, Medical center in Kolomenskoye CJSC

4 Academika Oparina Str., Moscow 117997; 
19 bldg. 2, Vysokaya Str., Moscow 115533



References

1. Scholien R.R., Hopman M.T., Sweep F.C. et al. Co-occurrence of cardiovascular and prothrombotic risk factors in women with a history of preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(1):97–105. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e318273764b.

2. Belokrinitskaya T.E., Frolova N.I., Anokhova L.I. Molecular genetic predictors of pregnancy complications. [Molekulyarno-geneticheskie prediktory oslozhnenij beremennosti]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2019. 188 p. (In Russ.).

3. The global strategy for women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health (2016-2030). New York: United Nations, 2015. 108 p. Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/child-health/the-global-strategy-for-women-s-children-s-and-adolescents-health-2016-2030.pdf. [Accessed: 20.04.2024].

4. Mészáros B., Kukor Z., Valent S. Recent advances in the prevention and screening of preeclampsia. J Clin Med. 2023;12(18):6020. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12186020.

5. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003018.

6. Tiruneh S.A., Vu T.T.T., Moran L.J. et al. Externally validated prediction models for pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024;63(5):592–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27490.

7. Danielli M., Thomas R.C., Gillies C.L. et al. Blood biomarkers to predict the onset of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2022;8(11):e11226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11226.

8. Roberts J.M., Rich-Edwards J.W., McElrath T.F. et al; Global Pregnancy Collaboration. Subtypes of preeclampsia: recognition and determining clinical usefulness. Hypertension. 2021;77(5):1430–41. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14781.

9. Xie G., Chen H., He C. et al. The dysregulation of miRNAs in epilepsy and their regulatory role in inflammation and apoptosis. Funct Integr Genomics. 2023;23(3):287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-023-01220-y.

10. Redman C.W.G., Staff A.C., Roberts J.M. Syncytiotrophoblast stress in preeclampsia: the convergence point for multiple pathways. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(2S):S907–S927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.047.

11. Gareev I.F., Beylerli O.A. Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers: what are perspectives? [Cirkuliruyushchie mikroRNK kak biomarkery: kakie perspektivy?] Profilakticheskaya medicina. 2018;21(6):142–50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed201821061142.

12. Clinical guidelines – Preeclampsia. Eclampsia. Edema, proteinuria and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period – 2021-2022-2023 (24.06.2021). [Klinicheskie rekomendacii – Preeklampsiya. Eklampsiya. Oteki, proteinuriya i gipertenzivnye rasstrojstva vo vremya beremennosti, v rodah i poslerodovom periode – 2021-2022-2023 (24.06.2021). Moscow: Ministerstvo zdravoohraneniya Rossiijskoj Federacii, 2021. 54 p. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/637_1. [Accessed: 20.04.2024].

13. Laasanen J., Romppanen E.L., Hiltunen M. et al. Two exonic single nucleotide polymorphisms in the microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene are jointly associated with preeclampsia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002;10(9):569–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200849.

14. Timofeeva A.V., Gusar V.A., Kan N.E. et al. Identification of potential early biomarkers of preeclampsia. Placenta. 2018;61:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2017.11.011.

15. Iacobelli S., Bonsante F., Robillard P.-V. Comparison of risk factors and perinatal outcomes in early onset and late onset preeclampsia: a cohort based study in Reunion Island. J Reprod Immunol. 2017;123:12–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2017.08.005.

16. Jardim L., Rios D., Perucci L. et al. Is the imbalance between pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors associated with preeclampsia? Clini Chim Acta. 2015;447:34–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2015.05.004.

17. Panaitescu A., Syngelaki A., Prodan N. et al. Chronic hypertension and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(2):228–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17554.

18. Donker R.B., Mouillet J.-F., Nelson D.M., Sadovsky Y. The expression of Argonaute2 and related microRNA biogenesis proteins in normal and hypoxic trophoblasts. Mol Hum Reprod. 2007;13(4):273–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gam006.

19. Ji L., Brkić J., Liu M. et al. Placental trophoblast cell differentiation: physiological regulation and pathological relevance to preeclampsia. Mol Asp Med. 2013;34(5):981–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2012.12.008.

20. Seitz H., Royo H., Bortolin M.-L. et al. A large imprinted microRNA gene cluster at the mouse Dlk1-Gtl2 domain. Genome Res. 2004;14(9):1741–8. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2743304.

21. Yin Y., Liu M., Yu H. et al. Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;253:121–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.016.

22. Lu Q., Ma Z., Ding Y. et al. Circulating miR-103a-3p contributes to angiotensin II-induced renal inflammation and fibrosis via a SNRK/NF-κB/p65 regulatory axis. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10116-0.

23. Zhang C., Zhang C., Wang H. et al. Effects of miR-103a-3p on the autophagy and apoptosis of cardiomyocytes by regulating Atg5. Int J Mol Med. 2019;43(5):1951–60. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2019.4128.

24. He L., Xu J., Bai Y. et al. MicroRNA-103a regulates the calcification of vascular smooth muscle cells by targeting runt-related transcription factor 2 in high phosphorus conditions. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(3):1036. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10468.

25. Pakin V.S., Vashukova E.S., Kapustin R.V. et al. Peculiarities of placental microRNA expression in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia. [Ocenka urovnya mikroRNK v placente pri tyazhelom gestoze na fone gestacionnogo saharnogo diabeta]. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskih boleznej. 2017;66(3):110–5. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD663110-115.

26. Li T., Mo X., Fu L. et al. Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs on gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(8):8601–12. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6926.

27. Madsen H., Ditzel J. Blood-oxygen transport in first trimester of diabetic pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1984;63(4):317–20. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016348409155523.

28. Ishibashi O., Ohkuchi A., Ali M.M. et al. Hydroxysteroid (17-β) dehydrogenase 1 is dysregulated by miR-210 and miR-518c that are aberrantly expressed in preeclamptic placentas: a novel marker for predicting preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2012;59(2):265–73. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.180232.

29. Timofeeva A.V., Fedorov I.S., Sukhova Y.V. et al. Prediction of early- and late-onset pre-eclampsia in the preclinical stage via placenta-specific extracellular miRNA profiling. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(9):8006. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098006.

30. Inno R., Kikas T., Lillepea K., Laan M. Coordinated expressional landscape of the human placental miRNome and transcriptome. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:697947. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.697947.


What is already known about this subject?

► Preeclampsia (РЕ) is a multifactorial pathology and resulting from collective effect of various factors (genetic, epigenetic, immunological, environmental, etc.).

► At present, there is a search mainly tending for anamnestic, clinical and biochemical predictors of PE development particularly biomarkers available in practice to be used to predict PE development and severity in early pregnancy.

► Given the wide functional miRNAs potential, an active research field is to seek out for and identify new molecules involved in РЕ development.

What are the new findings?

► РЕ has been shown to be characterized by specific molecular changes at the transcriptome level.

► It has been established the high prognostic value for hsa-miR-103a-3p, hsa-miR-451a and hsa-miR-516a-5p involved in РЕ pathogenesis.

► A prognostic РЕ developmental model was put forward based on the clinically most significant differentially expressed plasma microRNAs.

How might it impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?

► MicroRNAs are promising biomarkers with good diagnostic potential for implementation in a screening program to predict РЕ and can be used as a sensitive indicator for clinical prediction of pregnancy complications.

► The developed logistic model can be used for prediction and early РЕdiagnostics able to reduce obstetric complications and improve perinatal outcomes.

Review

For citations:


Melnik A.V., Solovyova V.E., Yatsenko Yu.O., Filippova A.E., Asryan E.G., Seitumerov T.Е., Myshak E.R., Chernysheva Yu.A., Ziyadinova S.A., Kononenko V.O., Kadyrova M.R., Denisenko A.A., Ismagilova K.T., Mushinsky D.V., Sorokina L.E. Transcriptomic profile assessment for preeclampsia prediction and early diagnostics. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2024;18(3):316-327. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2024.521

Views: 751


ISSN 2313-7347 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3194 (Online)