Risk factors for perinatal loss - reality or fiction?
https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2021.185
Abstract
Aim: to identify factors predisposing to perinatal losses, assessment of which is available at the first (only) visit of pregnant woman in antenatal clinic.
Materials and Methods. A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 964 women who performed delivery in 2009-2019 in 15 obstetric facilities was carried out. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the main group included 457 women with perinatal losses (stillbirth - 328 children, and 129 children with early neonatal death); the control group consisted of 507 women, whose children survived 7 days during postnatal period. We analyzed parameters routinely determined by an obstetrician-gynecologist at the first visit of woman during within ongoing pregnancy (regardless of gestation age), namely, social status, anamnesis, data of initial examination.
Results. The following significant differences were revealed in pregnant women from the main group: a younger age of pregnancy; no registered marriage and permanent job as well as primary and secondary education; smoking, alcohol and drug use; concurrent diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders, blood contact infections, obesity; older menarche age and younger sexual debut age; medical history contains infectious genital pathology, more often pregnancies and childbirths, two or more abortions before repeated childbirth, premature births.
Conclusion. Thus, the anamnestic indicators noted above can be used to create prognostic statistical systems and models to determine high risk of perinatal losses of any nature.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. F. BezhenarRussian Federation
Vitaly F. Bezhenar - MD, Dr Sci Med, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Chief External Expert - Obstetrician-Gynecologist of the Health Committee of Saint Petersburg.
6–8 Lev Tolstoy Str., Saint Petersburg 197022.
L. A. Ivanova
Russian Federation
Lidiya A. Ivanova - MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kirov Military Medical Academy, Ministry of Defense of Russian Federation.
6 Akademika Lebedeva Str., Saint Petersburg 194044.
N. A. Tatarova
Russian Federation
Nina A. Tatarova - MD, Dr Sci Med, Professor, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University.
6–8 Lev Tolstoy Str., Saint Petersburg 197022.
M. Yu. Korshunov
Russian Federation
Mikhail Yu. Korshunov - MD, Dr Sci Med, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University.
6–8 Lev Tolstoy Str., Saint Petersburg 197022.
References
1. Kozhabekova T.A., Bekmoldakyzy M., Akhmetbekova A.S. Antenatal death of fetus: reasons and risk factors. [Antenatal'naya gibel' ploda: prichiny i faktory riska]. Vestnik Kazahskogo Nacional'nogo medicinskogo universiteta. 2018;(3):4-8. (In Russ.).
2. Kovalenko V.L., Pasternak A.E., Pasternak I.A. Clinical and pathological analysis of perinatal mortality - methodological and methodical aspects, areas of improvement. [Kliniko-patologoanatomicheskij analiz perinatal'noj smertnosti - metodologicheskie i metodicheskie aspekty, napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya]. Medicinskaya nauka i obrazovanie Urala. 2013;14(4):86-90. (In Russ.).
3. Frolova O.G., Tokova Z.Z. Main induces of the activity of obstetric and gynecological service and reproductive health. [Osnovnye pokazateli deyatel'nosti akushersko-ginekologicheskoj sluzhby i reproduktivnogo zdorov'ya]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2005;(1):3-6. (In Russ.).
4. Barinova I.V. Pathogenesis of antenatal death: phenotypes of fetal losses and tanatogenesis. [Patogenez antenatal'noj smerti: fenotipy plodovyh poter' i tanatogenez]. Rossijskij vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2015;15(1):68-76. (In Russ.).
5. Measey M.-A, Charles A., d'Espaignet E.T. et al. Aetiology of stillbirth: unexplored is not unexplained. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31(5):444-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00116.x.
6. Zanconato G., Piazzola E., Caloi E. et al. Clinicopathological evaluation of 59 cases of fetal death. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;276(6):619-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0391-8.
7. Ottaviani G. Defining sudden infant death and sudden intrauterine unexpected death syndromes with regard to anatomo-pathological examination. Front Pediatr. 2016;4:103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2016.00103.
8. Sukhanova L.P., Kuznetsova T.V. Prenatal problems of reproduction of the population of Russia (according to analysis of №№ 13, 32 statistical forms). [Perinatal'nye problemy vosproizvodstva naseleniya Rossii (po dannym analiza statisticheskih form №№ 13, 32)]. Social'nye aspekty zdorov'ya naseleniya. 2010;(4):11-21. (In Russ.).
9. Order of the Ministry of Health of Russia dated June 6, 2013 N 354n "On the procedure for conducting pathological autopsies". [Prikaz Minzdrava Rossii ot 6 iyunya 2013 g. N 354n «O poryadke provedeniya patologoanatomicheskih vskrytij»]. Moscow, 2013. Available at: http://www.rosminzdrav.ru/documents/8041-o-poryadke-provedeniya-patologo-anatomicheskih-vskrytiy. (In Russ.).
10. Persianinov L.S., Kiryushchenkov A.P., Frolova O.G. Factors and high-risk groups of pregnant women. [Faktory i gruppy vysokogo riska beremennyh zhenshchin]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 1976;(10):7-11. (In Russ.).
11. Bezhenar V.F., Ivanova L.A., Grigoryev S.G. High risk pregnancy and perinatal losses. [Beremennost' «vysokogo riska» i perinatal'nye poteri]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2020;(3):42-7. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.3.42-47
12. Granatovich N.N., Frolova E.R. Regional features of mortinatality. [Regional'nye aspekty mertvorozhdaemosti]. Vestnik novyh medicinskih tekhnologij. 2018;25(3):223-6. (In Russ.).
13. Abdrakhmanov F.M. Possibilitiesforpredictingobstetriccomplicationsfromp uberty. III Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Tajikistan. [III s"yezdakusherov-ginekologovTadzhikistana]. Dushanbe, 1996. 79-82. (In Russ.).
14. Naumova E.V. Causative factors of antenatal fetal death. [Prichinnye faktory antenatal'noj gibeli ploda]. Byulleten' medicinskih internet-konferencij. 2017;7(6):796-7. (In Russ.).
15. Olina A.A., Sadykova G.S., Shirinkina E.V., Semiagina L.M. Comparative analysis of risk factors among women with antenatal fetal asphyxia. [Sravnitel'nyj analiz faktorov riska u zhenshchin s antenatal'noj asfiksiej ploda]. Medicinskaya nauka i obrazovanie Urala. 2018;19(2):14-8. (In Russ.).
16. Gardosi J., Madurasinghe V., Williams M. et al. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ. 2013;346:108. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f108.
17. Suverneva A.A., Butkeeva A.A., Sapakhova E.Kh. To the question of early neonatal mortality. [K voprosu ob intranatal'noj gibeli ploda]. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental'nyh issledovanij. 2014;(2-2):135-7. (In Russ.).
18. Bushmeleva N.N. Issues with regional medical aid, provided to women in mortality cases in the perinatal period. [Defekty okazaniya medicinskoj pomoshchi zhenshchinam v sluchayah smerti v perinatal'nom periode na urovne regiona]. Menedzher zdravoohraneniya. 2014;(11):27-36. (In Russ.).
19. Kolesnikova O.M., Orazmuradov A.A., Kibardina N.V. et al. Perinatal outcomes at first labor after surgical and medical abortion. [Perinatal'nye iskhody u pervorodyashchih posle hirurgicheskogo i medikamentoznogo abortov]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Medicina. 2012;(6):90-4. (In Russ.).
20. Sasina V.I., Varlamova A.I. Pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum period in women underwent abortions in the past (review). [Beremennost', rody i poslerodovyj period u zhenshchin, perenesshih aborty v proshlom (obzor literatury)]. Molodoj uchenyj. 2017;(3-3):55-8. (In Russ.).
21. Iversen O.E., Midboe G. Johnsen S.L. et al. Medical abortion - the first Norwegian experiences. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2003;123(17):2422-4.
Review
For citations:
Bezhenar V.F., Ivanova L.A., Tatarova N.A., Korshunov M.Yu. Risk factors for perinatal loss - reality or fiction? Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2021;15(4):360-370. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2021.185

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.