Current approaches to the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs in pregnant women with thrombocytopenia caused by hemostasis activation

Introduction. At present, hemostasis disorders still hold one of the lead places in the pathogenesis of reproductive losses associated with high risk of miscarriage and remain one of the major causes for developing serious obstetric complications. Relevance, efficacy and safety of using drugs containing acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in pregnant women with thrombocytopenia comorbid with intravascular coagulation activation remain pressing issues. The study of thrombocytopenia pathogenesis during pregnancy and search for new methods of hemostasis correction are accounted for by high risk of developing diverse perinatal complications and necessity to conduct prophylactic measures for their prevention.

Aim: to study hemostasis changes and clinical outcomes in pregnant women with thrombocytopenia, to substantiate the use of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants in pregnant women with activated intravascular blood coagulation for preventing development of thromboembolic and placenta-associated complications of pregnancy.

Materials and Methods. A multicenter prospective study was conducted by enrolling 299 pregnant women at a gestational age of

22.85 [22.00; 25.00] weeks, whose average age was 31.06 [27.75; 35.00] years. There were distinguished three groups: main group (n = 124) consisted of pregnant women with lowered platelet count and activated intravascular blood coagulation, who received ASA preparations and LMWH in prophylactic doses for 4 weeks; pregnant comparison groups (n = 125) received no such drugs; control group (n = 50) consisted of women with normal platelet counts during physiological pregnancy. All patients underwent clinical, anamnestic and laboratory examination, and the clinical outcomes of pregnancy were assessed.

Results. It was found that use of ASA (a combined drug: ASA 75 mg + magnesium hydroxide 15.2 mg/day) and LMWH (enoxaparin sodium) in pregnant women from the main group were noted to improve hemostasis parameters: via markedly increased platelet count, decreased fibrinogen level, prothrombin index as well as normalized antithrombin III level (p < 0.01). It was also found during treatment that the D-dimer level and the rate (83.6 ± 2.3 % and 72.4 ± 2.7 %) and the degree (86.4 ± 2.7 % and 74.4 ±

2.8 %) of platelet aggregation in the main group (in contrast with comparison group) were significantly decreased (p < 0.01). The frequency of detected chronic placental insufficiency was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the comparison group (n = 50; 41.32 %) vs. the main group after receiving ASA and LMWH (n = 20; 16.52 %). The incidence of moderate (p = 0.016) and severe (p = 0.018) preeclampsia was significantly higher in the comparison group vs. the main group. While comparing the volume of blood loss during delivery, there were no differences between the main group and the comparison group (p = 0.46); it was noted only a statistically significant difference compared to the control group (p = 0.04), in which the lowest blood loss was found (337.9 [200.0; 600.0] ml) in comparison with the other two groups (p1,3 = 0.05; p2,3 = 0.04). It should be noted that the volume of blood 

loss in all groups remained within the physiological permissible range.

Conclusion. Our clinical and laboratory study allowed to substantiate relevance of using ASA and LMWH drugs in pregnant women with thrombocytopenia comorbid with confirmed activation of intravascular blood coagulation, for prevention of thromboembolic and placenta-associated complications of pregnancy as well as proved safety of such drugs during pregnancy.

1. Blumenfeld Z., Brenner B. Thrombophilia-associated pregnancy wastage. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(5):765–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00360-x.

2. Borrelli A.L., Brillante M., Borzacchiello C., Berlingieri P. Hemocoagulative pathology and immunological recurrent abortion. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1997;24(1):39–40.

3. Caruso A., De Carolis S., Di Simone N. Antiphospholipid antibodies in obstetrics: new complexities and sites of action. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5(3):267–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/5.3.267.

4. Starchenko K.V. The value of determining resistance to activated protein C and FV Leiden mutations in pregnant and postpartum women with thrombosis. [Znachenie opredeleniya rezistentnosti k aktivirovannomu proteinu S i FV mutacii Lejdena u beremennyh i rodil'nic s trombozami: Avtoref. dis. kand. med. nauk]. Moscow, 2000. 24 p. (In Russ.).

5. Boden-Albala B., Sacco R.L., Lee H.S. et al. Metabolic syndrome and ischemic stroke risk: Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke. 2008;39(l):30–5. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.496588.

6. Eldibany M.M., Caprini J A. Hyperhomocysteinemia and thrombosis: an overview. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131(6):872–84. https://doi.org/10.1043/1543-2165(2007)131[872:HATAO]2.0.CO;2.

7. Menke J., Lüthje L., Kastrup A., Larsen J. Thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105(4):502–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.018.

8. Fujikura T., Benson R.C. Placentitis and fibrous occlusion of fetal vessels in the placentas of stillborn infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1964;89:225–32 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(64)90715-x.

9. Kitzmiller J.L., Benirschke K. Immunofluorescent study of placental bed vessels in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973;115(2):248–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(73)90293-7.

10. Naeye R.L. Placental infarction leading to fetal or neonatal death. A prospective study. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;50(5):583–8.

11. Fox H. The histopathology of placental insufficiency. J Clin Pathol Suppl (R Coll Pathol). 1976;10:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.s3-10.1.1.

12. Goddijn-Wessel T.A., Wouters M.G., van de Molen E.F. et al. Hyperhomocysteinaemia: a risk factor for placental abruption or infraction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;66(1):23–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-2115(96)02383-4.

13. Palta A., Dhiman P. Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36(2):146–52. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2015.1041893.

14. Gernsheimer T., James A.H., Stasi R. How I treat thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Blood. 2013;121(1):38–47. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood2012-08-448944.

15. Boehlen F., Hohlfeld P., Extermann P. et al. Platelet count at term pregnancy: a reappraisal of the threshold. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(1):29– 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00537-2.

16. Bergmann F., Rath W. The differential diagnosis of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(47):795–802. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0795.

17. Jodkowska A., Martynowicz H., Kaczmarek-Wdowiak B., Mazur G. Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy – pathogenesis and diagnostic approach. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2015;69:1215–21. https://doi.org/10.5604/17322693.1179649.

18. Mishchenko A.L. Antithrombotic therapy for various clinical forms of DIC-syndrome in obstetrics. [Protivotromboticheskaya terapiya prirazlichnyh klinicheskih formah DVS sindroma v akusherstve]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 1999;(2):41–5. (In Russ.).

19. Abalos E., Cuesta C., Grosso A.L. et al. Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.005.

20. Ananth C.V., Keyes K.M., Wabner R.J. Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980–2010: age-period-cohort analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f6564. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6564.

21. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 166: Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):e43–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001641.

22. Aylamazyan E.K., Mozgovaya E.V. Gestosis: theory and practice. [Gestoz: teoriya i praktika]. Moscow: MEDpress-inform, 2008. 272 p. (In Russ.).

23. Endothelial dysfunction: causes, mechanisms, pharmacological correction. Ed. H.H. Petrishchev. [Disfunkciya endoteliya: prichiny, mekhanizmy, farmakologicheskaya korrekciya. Pod red. H.H. Petrishcheva]. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGMU, 2003. 181 p. (In Russ.).

24. Musaev Z.M., Pitskhelauri E.G. Gestosis: current problems in early diagnosis and obstetric policy. [Gestozy: aktual'nye voprosy rannej diagnostiki i akusherskoj taktiki]. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2002;1(1):60–3. (In Russ.).

25. Erez O., Mastrolia S.A., Thachil J. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in pregnancy: insights in pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4):452–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.054.

26. Galloway S., Lyons G. HELLP, coagulopathy and renal failure – further lessons. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2003;12(1):35–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-289x(02)00134-6.

27. Kulakov V.I., Murashko L.E., Burlev V.A. The clinico-biochemical aspects of the pathogenesis of gestosis. [Kliniko-biohimicheskie aspekty patogeneza gestoza]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 1995;(6):3–5. (In Russ.).

28. Mishchenko A.L., Makatsariya A.D. Questions of circulatory adaptation of hemostasis during physiological pregnancy and disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome. [Voprosy cirkulyatornoj adaptacii sistemy gemostaza pri fiziologicheskoj beremennosti i sindrom disseminirovannogo vnutrisosudistogo svertyvaniya]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 1997;(1):38–41. (In Russ.).

29. Burrows R.F., Hunter D.J., Andrew M., Kelton J.G. A prospective study investigating the mechanism of thrombocytopenia in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70(3 Pt 1):334–8.

30. Kaibara M., Marumoto Y., Taniguchi I., Kobayashi T. Hemorheological studies on platelet counts and size in normal pregnancy and pregnancies with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1989;41(9):1380–1.

31. Sidorova I.S. Gestosis. Tutorial. Moscow: Medicine, 2003. 415 p. (In Russ.).

32. Erez O., Hallak M., Luber A. et al. Platelets activation marker as predictor of severe preeclampsia in patients with history of preeclampsia.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):S175. https://doi.org/10.1016/s00029378(01)80374-4.

33. Salakheeva G.S., Ponukalina E.V., Glukhova T.N., Chesnokova N.P. Changes of peripheral blood in pregnant women with gestosis of different degree of severity. [Dinamika izmenenij pokazatelej perifericheskoj krovi u beremennyh s gestozom razlichnoj stepeni tyazhesti]. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2006;(10):20–3. (In Russ.).

34. Repina M.A., Sumskaya G.F., Lapina E.N., Kuzmina-Krutetskaya S.R. Adverse pregnancy outcome and inherited thrombophilia. [Osobennosti techeniya beremennosti u zhenshchin s nasledstvennymi formami trombofilii]. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskih boleznej. 2026;55(2):3–9. (In Russ.).

35. Savelyeva G.M., Fedorova M.V., Klimenko P.A., Sichinava L.G. Placental insufficiency. [Placentarnaya nedostatochnost']. Moscow: Medicina, 1991. 276 p. (In Russ.).

36. Belfort M.A., Uys P., Dommise J., Davey D.A. Hemodynamic changes in gestational proteinuric hypertension. The effects of rapid volume expansion and vasodilator therapy. BJOG. 1989;96:641–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03276.x.

37. Genievskaya M.G., Makatsariya A.D. Low molecular weight heparin (Fraxiparine) as long-term single agent therapy in pregnant with antiphospholipid syndrome. [Dlitel'naya terapiya s primeneniem fraksiparina u beremennyh s antifosfolipidnym sindromom]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2002;(1):24–7. (In Russ.).

38. Dunn J.C., Sorcin E.M. Dalteparin sodium. A review of its pharmacology and clinical use in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Drugs. 1996;52(2):276–305. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199652020-00011.

39. Hirsh J., Warkentin T.E., Shaughnessy S.G. et al. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, monitoring, efficacy and safety. Chest. 2001;119(1 Suppl):64S– 94S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.119.1_suppl.64s.

40. Kornyushina E.A. Clinical and pathogenetic objectives of curantil and fraxiparine use in pregnant women with miscarriage and thrombophilia. [Kliniko-patogeneticheskoe obosnovanie primeneniya kurantila i fraksiparina u beremennyh s nevynashivaniem i trombofiliej: Avtoref. dis. kand. med. nauk]. SPb., 2011. 24 p. (In Russ.).