Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction

Advanced search

Lex biomedica: concept, nature and ontology

Full Text:


The article is devoted to the study and explanation of the meaning, nature, structure, features and ontology of extra-legal regulation in the field of healthcare and medicine (lex biomedica). The authors explain the concept and structure of lex biomedica. The article shows other ontological spaces of the bioethical order associated with the lex biomedica normative space; the content of the subject-object area of lex biomedica regulation is described in detail. The article describes and explains the features of the interactions between the space of legal regulation and the space of extra-legal regulation in the field of healthcare. The authors refer to the concept of "bio-law".

About the Authors

I. V. Ponkin
Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Igor V. Ponkin – Dr Sci Law, Professor, State Professor

84 Vernadskogo Ave., Moscow 119606, Russia

A. A. Ponkina
Institute of relations between the State and religious denominations and Law
Russian Federation

Alexandra A. Ponkina – PhD (Law), Deputy Director

PO box 49, Moscow 117525, Russia


1. Makatsariya A.D. Paliko Yasonovich Kintraya. Marking the 85th anniversary of his birthday. [Paliko Yasonovich Kintraya. K 85-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya]. Akusherstvo, Ginekologia i Reprodukcia. 2018;12(3):84–8. (In Russ.).

2. Gielen J. Introduction: Normativity in Context. Dealing with Bioethical Issues in a Globalized World: Normativity in Bioethics. Ed. J. Gielen. Cham (Switzerland): Springer, 2020. 209 p.

3. Mooney C. Bioethics. Detroit: Gale; Cengage Learning, 2009. 112 p.

4. Kanunnikova L.V., Sidorova T.A. Bioethics: From Normalization to the Norm. [Bioetika: ot normalizacii k norme]. Medicinskoe pravo. 2014;(5):3–7. (In Russ.).

5. Palazzani L. Biolaw. Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Ed. H. Have. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2016. 3030 p.

6. Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century Building Answers for New Questions. Eds. E. Valdés, J.A. Lecaros. Cham (Switzerland): Springer, 2019. 347 p.

7. Beyleveld D., Brownsword R. Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 288 p.

8. Barilan Y.M. Human Dignity, Human Rights, and Responsibility: The New Language of Global Bioethics and Biolaw. Cambridge (Massachusetts, USA): MIT Press, 2012. 349 p.

9. Humanity across International Law and Biolaw. Eds. B. van Beers, L. Corrias, W. Werner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 311 p.

10. Callahan D. Bioethics. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. 3rd ed. Editor in chief: S.G. Post. New York: Macmillan Reference USA; Thomson Gale, 2004. 3062 p.

11. Sidorova T.A. The normative status of bioethics. [Normativnyj status bioetiki]. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Filosofiya. 2014:12(3):69–75. (In Russ.).

12. Macer D. Why bioethics is needed and what bioethics is needed. Available at: [Accessed: 01.07.2020].

13. Brody H. The Future of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. 261 p.

14. Pellegrino E.D. Bioethics as an interdisciplinary enterprise: Where does ethics fit in the mosaic of disciplines? Philosophy of Medicine and Bioethics: A Twenty-Year Retrospective and Critical Appraisal. Eds. R.A. Carson, C.R. Burns. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. 357 p.

15. Potter V.R. Bioethics: The science of survival. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 1970:14(1):127–53.

16. Potter V.R. Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice- Hall, 1971. 205 p.

17. Spielman B.J. Bioethics in Law. Totowa (New Jersey, USA): Humana Press, 2007. 192 p.

18. Düwell M. Bioethics: Methods, theories, domains. London: Routledge, 2012. 304 p.

19. Downie R., Macnaughton J. Bioethics and the Humanities: Attitudes and Perceptions. New York: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007. 188 p.

For citation:

Ponkin I.V., Ponkina A.A. Lex biomedica: concept, nature and ontology. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2020;14(4):515-522. (In Russ.)

Views: 155

ISSN 2313-7347 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3194 (Online)