PATHOMORPHOLOGY OF PLACENTA IN WOMEN WITH PRETERM BIRTHS AT DIFFERENT AGE OF GESTATION
https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347.2017.11.4.023-029
Abstract
The aim: to identify pathological characteristics of placenta in women with preterm labor according to the gestational age.
Materials and methods. The study involved 55 women who gave birth prematurely: 21 women with gestational age from |22 to 32 weeks (group 1) and 34 women with gestational age from 32 to 37 weeks (group 2). All the women had spontaneous singleton pregnancies followed by preterm spontaneous births. We conducted a comparative analysis of the social, clinical and amnestic information, as well as a histopathological study of the placentas; the latter included macroscopic description, organometry and microscopic morphology. The analysis aimed to identify the placental factors associated with the premature delivery occurred before and after 32 weeks of gestation.
Results. The study revealed a number of anamnestic and clinical factors associated with preterm births. At a gestational age up to 32 weeks, the placentas showed hypoplasia with a mass deficit of more than 30% in combination with proliferative vylusitis, post-inflammatory hypovascularization, abnormal differentiation of the vascular-stromal component of the villi, and insufficient compensatory and adaptive reactions. After 32 weeks of pregnancy the placenta characteristics included chronic disorders of the maternal and fetal blood circulation, compensatory hyperplasia of the terminal villi, capillaries and their syncytia capillary membranes.
Conclusion. There is a need for individual rehabilitation programs for women with the history of preterm births that would include their clinical and anamnestic background together with the pathomorphological characteristics of their placentas. Such a program is expected to help these women to be better prepared prior to their subsequent pregnancy.
About the Authors
A. I. MalyshkinaRussian Federation
Malyshkina Anna Ivanovna – MD, Associate Professor, Director
ul. Pobedy, 20, Ivanovo, 153045.
Head of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Genetics.
Sheremetevskiy prospekt, 8, Ivanovo, 153012.
A. O. Nazarova
Russian Federation
Nazarova Alla Olegovna – PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Sheremetevskiy prospekt, 8, Ivanovo, 153012.
L. V. Kulida
Russian Federation
Kulida Ludmila Victorovna – МD, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Рathomorphology and Еlectron microscopy.
ul. Pobedy, 20, Ivanovo, 153045.
A. A. Kozyrina
Russian Federation
Kozyrina Anna Aleksandrovna – Obstetrician-gynecologist.
ul. Pobedy, 20, Ivanovo, 153045.
Yu. N. Zholobov
Russian Federation
Zholobov Yury Nikolaevich – Postgraduate оbstetrician-gynecologist.
ul. Pobedy, 20, Ivanovo, 153045.
S. B. Nazarov
Russian Federation
Nazarov Sergey Borisovich – MD, Professor, Deputy Scientific Director.
ul. Pobedy, 20, Ivanovo, 153045.
References
1. Lawn J.E., Kinney M.V., Belizan J.M., Mason E.M., McDougall L., Larson J., Lackritz E., Friberg I.K., Howson C.P. Born Too Soon Preterm Birth Action Group. Reprod Health. 2013; 10 (Suppl 1): S6. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-S1-S6.
2. Levakov S.A., Borovkova E.I., Sheshukova N.A., Borovkov I.M. Management of patients with ischemic-cervical insufficiency [Vedenie pacientok s istmiko-cervikal'noj nedostatochnost'yu]. Akusherstvo, ginekologiya i reprodukciya. 2016; 10 (2): 64-9 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17749/23137347.2016.10.2.064-069.
3. Bant'eva M.N. Analysis of obstetrics rate in Russia in the dynamics for 2006-2015 [Analiz pokazatelej rodovspomozheniya v Rossii v dinamike za 2006-2015 gg]. Akusherstvo, ginekologiya i reprodukciya. 2016; 10 (4): 54-5 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17749/2313-7347.2016.10.4.054-059.
4. Malyshkina A.I., Nazarova A.O., Kozyrina A.A., Zholobov Yu.N., Nazarov S.B. Medico-social characteristics of women with threatening premature births [Mediko-social'naya harakteristika zhenshchin s ugrozhayushchimi prezhdevremennymi rodami]. Akusherstvo, ginekologiya i reprodukciya. 2016; 10 (2): 37-43 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17749/23137347.2016.10.2.037-043.
5. Gravett M.G., Rubens C.E., Nunes T.M. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (2 of 7): discovery science. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010; 10 (Suppl 1): S2. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S2.
6. Malyshkina A.I., Nazarova A.O., Kulida L.V., Kozyrina A.A., Nazarov S.B., Zholobov Yu.N. Pathomorphological features of the placenta in women with threatening premature birth, depending on the outcome of pregnancy. [Patomorfologicheskie osobennosti placent u zhenshchin s ugrozhayushchimi prezhdevremennymi rodami v zavisimosti ot iskhoda beremennosti]. Rossijskij vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2016; 16 (5): 4-9 (in Russian).
7. Kelly R., Holzman C., Senagore P., Wang J., Tian Y., Rahbar M.H., Chung H. Placental vascular pathology findings and pathways to preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 2009; 170 (2): 148-58. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp131.
8. Lockwood C. Risk factors for preterm birth and new approaches to its early diagnosis. J Perinatal Med. 2015; 43 (5): 499-501. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0261.
9. Morgan T. Role of the Placenta in Preterm Birth: A Review. Am J Perinatol. 2016; 33 (3): 258-66. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1570379.
10. Redline R.W. Placental pathology: Is it time to get serious? Contemporary OB/GYN. 2014; 59 (2): 41-8.
Review
For citations:
Malyshkina A.I., Nazarova A.O., Kulida L.V., Kozyrina A.A., Zholobov Yu.N., Nazarov S.B. PATHOMORPHOLOGY OF PLACENTA IN WOMEN WITH PRETERM BIRTHS AT DIFFERENT AGE OF GESTATION. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2017;11(4):23-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347.2017.11.4.023-029

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.