<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">akusherstvo</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Акушерство, Гинекология и Репродукция</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2313-7347</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2500-3194</issn><publisher><publisher-name>IRBIS LLC</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">akusherstvo-94</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ОRIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ETHICS IN OBSTETRIC PRACTICE</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ЭТИКА В АКУШЕРСКОЙ ПРАКТИКЕ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Червенак</surname><given-names>Ф. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Chervenak</surname><given-names>F. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">wcmc-admissions@med.cornell.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>МакКуллоу</surname><given-names>Л. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>McCullough</surname><given-names>L. B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Департамент Акушерства и Гинекологии. Медицинский Колледж Вейл Корнелльского Университета (Нью-Йорк, США)</institution><country>Соединённые Штаты Америки</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University (New York, USA)</institution><country>United States</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Центр Медицинской Этики и Охраны здоровья. Колледж Медицины Бэйлор (Хьюстон, США)</institution><country>Соединённые Штаты Америки</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Вауlor College of Medicine (Houston, USA)</institution><country>United States</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>06</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>47</fpage><lpage>52</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Червенак Ф.А., МакКуллоу Л.Б.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.gynecology.su/jour/article/view/94">https://www.gynecology.su/jour/article/view/94</self-uri><abstract><p>Ethics is an essential dimension of obstetric practice. There is defined medical ethics and the fundamental ethical principles of beneficence and respect for autonomy. We then show how these two principles should interact in obstetric judgment and practice with emphasis on the core concept of the foetus as a patient. We then describe the professional responsibility of obstetric ethics. Obstetricians have beneficence based and autonomy-based obligations to the pregnant patient and beneficence-based obligations to the foetal patient.The result is evidence- based clinical judgement about diagnostic and therapeutic measures that are reliably expected to result in a greater balance of clinical goods over clinical harms. The pregnant woman's autonomy is empowered by offering or recommending medically reasonable alternatives. The informed consent process should be used as a preventive ethics tool.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Этика является важным аспектом в акушерской практике. В рамках публикации дано определение медицинской этики, приведены фундаментальные этические принципы милосердия и уважения личности. Авторы раскрывают сущность взаимодействия этих принципов с акушерскими воззрениями и практическими подходами с фокусом на концепции, рассматривающей плод в качестве пациента. В работе описана профессио-нальная ответственность в плоскости этики в акушерстве. В своей работе акушеры должны основываться на милосердии и личностном подходе к беременной женщине, а также на обязательствах милосердия к плоду, как к пациенту. Результатом являются клинические суждения на основе фактических данных диагностических и лечебных мероприятий. Это должно сместить баланс клинической пользы и вреда в лучшую сторону. Беременная женщина имеет право получить рекомендованные, с медицинской точки зрения, разумные альтернативы. В качестве превентивного этического инструмента должно использоваться информированное согласие</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>акушерство</kwd><kwd>этика</kwd><kwd>профессиональная модель ответственности</kwd><kwd>информированное согласие</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>АКУШЕРСТВО</kwd><kwd>OBSTETRICS</kwd><kwd>ЭТИКА</kwd><kwd>ETHICS</kwd><kwd>ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНАЯ МОДЕЛЬ ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТИ</kwd><kwd>PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY MODEL</kwd><kwd>ИНФОРМИРОВАННОЕ СОГЛАСИЕ</kwd><kwd>INFORMED CONSENT</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Annas G.J. Protecting the liberty of pregnant patient. N Engl J Med. 1988; 316: 1213-4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Annas G.J. Protecting the liberty of pregnant patient. N Engl J Med. 1988; 316: 1213-4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics (6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics (6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Buckley S. Reclaiming every woman's birthright. Midwifery Today. Int Midwife. 2010; 94: 40-1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Buckley S. Reclaiming every woman's birthright. Midwifery Today. Int Midwife. 2010; 94: 40-1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Callahan S., Callahan D. (eds.) Abortion: Understanding Differences. New York, NY: Plenum Press. 1984.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Callahan S., Callahan D. (eds.) Abortion: Understanding Differences. New York, NY: Plenum Press. 1984.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B., Brent R.L. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics: avoiding the perils of clashing rights. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205: 315.e1-5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B., Brent R.L. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics: avoiding the perils of clashing rights. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205: 315.e1-5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B. The limits of viability. J Perinat Med. 1997; 25: 418-20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B. The limits of viability. J Perinat Med. 1997; 25: 418-20.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B., Levene Ml. An ethically justified clinically comprehensive approach to periviability: gynaecological, obstetric, perinatal, and neonatal dimensions. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007; 27: 3-7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B., Levene Ml. An ethically justified clinically comprehensive approach to periviability: gynaecological, obstetric, perinatal, and neonatal dimensions. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007; 27: 3-7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B. The moral foundation of medical leadership: the professional virtues of the physician as fiduciary of the patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 875-9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B. The moral foundation of medical leadership: the professional virtues of the physician as fiduciary of the patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 875-9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Engelhardt H.T., Jr. The Foundations of Bioethics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 1995.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Engelhardt H.T., Jr. The Foundations of Bioethics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 1995.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Faden R.R., Beauchamp T.L. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 1986.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Faden R.R., Beauchamp T.L. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 1986.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hogberg U., Lynoe N., Wulff M. Caesarean by choice? Empirical study of public attitudes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87: 1301-8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hogberg U., Lynoe N., Wulff M. Caesarean by choice? Empirical study of public attitudes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87: 1301-8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Johnson LSM. Abortion: II. Contemporary ethical and legal aspects: A. Ethical perspectives. In: Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Post S.G. (ed). New York, NY: Macmillan References; 2004: 7-18.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Johnson LSM. Abortion: II. Contemporary ethical and legal aspects: A. Ethical perspectives. In: Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Post S.G. (ed). New York, NY: Macmillan References; 2004: 7-18.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lyerly A.D., Little M.O. Toward an ethically responsible approach to vaginal birth after caesarean. Semin Perinatol. 2010; 34: 337-44.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lyerly A.D., Little M.O. Toward an ethically responsible approach to vaginal birth after caesarean. Semin Perinatol. 2010; 34: 337-44.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Minkoff H., Paltrow L. Obstetricians and the rights of pregnant women. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2007; 3: 315-9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Minkoff H., Paltrow L. Obstetricians and the rights of pregnant women. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2007; 3: 315-9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Minkoff H. NIH Vaginal Birth after Caesarean: New Insights. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference, March 10-13 2010; 6. Day 2 Discussion, available at http://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?Live=8408, accessed November 18, 2012.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Minkoff H. NIH Vaginal Birth after Caesarean: New Insights. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference, March 10-13 2010; 6. Day 2 Discussion, available at http://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?Live=8408, accessed November 18, 2012.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McCullough L.B., Chervenak F.A. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McCullough L.B., Chervenak F.A. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 1994.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McCullough L.B. The ethical concept of medicine as a profession: its origins in modern medical ethics and implications for physicians. In: Lost Virtue: Professional Character Development in Medical Education. Kenny N., Shelton W., (eds). New York: Elsevier. 2006; 17-27.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McCullough L.B. The ethical concept of medicine as a profession: its origins in modern medical ethics and implications for physicians. In: Lost Virtue: Professional Character Development in Medical Education. Kenny N., Shelton W., (eds). New York: Elsevier. 2006; 17-27.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schloendorff V. The Society of the New York Hospital, 211 N.Y. 125, 126, 105 N.E. 92, 93 (1914).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schloendorff V. The Society of the New York Hospital, 211 N.Y. 125, 126, 105 N.E. 92, 93 (1914).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Temkin O., Temkin C.L. (eds.) Hippocrates. Oath of hippocrates. Ancient Medicine: Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1976; 6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Temkin O., Temkin C.L. (eds.) Hippocrates. Oath of hippocrates. Ancient Medicine: Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1976; 6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
