akusherstvoObstetrics, Gynecology and ReproductionАкушерство, Гинекология и Репродукция2313-73472500-3194IRBIS LLC10.17749/2313-7347.2016.10.2.070-076akusherstvo-296Research ArticleREVIEW ARTICLEНАУЧНЫЙ ОБЗОРSURROGACY – LEGAL AND BIOETHICAL ISSUESСУРРОГАТНОЕ МАТЕРИНСТВО — ПРАВОВЫЕ И БИОЭТИЧЕСКИЕ РЕФЛЕКСИИПонкинаА. И.PonkinaA. A.

к.ю.н., заместитель председателя правления, эксперт Консорциума специалистов по защите прав пациентов,

117525, Москва, а/я 49

PhD (Law), Deputy Director of the Institute of relations between the State and religious denominations and Law,

expert of the Consortium of experts on patients' rights (Moscow),

PO box 49, Moscow, 117525

droit.du.patient@gmail.comПонкинИ. В.PonkinI. V.

д.ю.н., профессор кафедры государственного и муниципального управления Института государственной службы и управления,

профессор Московского государственного юридического университета им. О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА),

119606, г. Москва, проспект Вернадского, 84

doctor of science (Law), professor of the Institute of Public Administration and Management;

professor of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University, State Professor,

pr. Vernadskogo, 84, Moscow, 119606

i@lenta.ruИнститут государственно-конфессиональных отношений и праваРоссияInstitute of Church-State Relations and LawRussian FederationФГБОУ ВПО «Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации»РоссияRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationRussian Federation2016020920161027076Copyright © Ponkina A.A., Ponkin I.V., 20162016Понкина А.И., Понкин И.В.Ponkina A.A., Ponkin I.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.gynecology.su/jour/article/view/296

The article investigates the essence of the phenomenon of surrogacy (surrogate motherhood) from the standpoint of Bioethics and moral foundations of Law. Shows a selection of reference regulations of foreign Legislation. The authors present a Bioethical considerations of surrogacy and the most important issues related to the legal provision for surrogacy. Represented by the sample reference provisions of acts of a number of states (United States, Canada, Australia, United Kingdom, France, Russian Federation). The article suggests measures for improvement of the legislation of the Russian Federation in the context of restrictions to be imposed on the use of the surrogate motherhood technology.

Статья посвящена исследованию сути феномена суррогатного материнства с позиций биоэтики и нравственных оснований права. Представлена выборка референтных положений зарубежного законодательства. Представлена выборка положений актов ряда государств (США, Канада, Австралия, Великобритания, Франция, Россия). В статье предложены меры по совершенствованию законодательства Российской Федерации в контексте ограничений, налагаемых на использование технологий суррогатного материнства.

медицинское правосуррогатное материнствоправа материправа женщиныправа ребенказдравоохранениеправо на охрану здоровьягосударственное управления в области здравоохранениясравнительное правомедицинаmedical lawsurrogacy (surrogate motherhood)mother rightswomen's rightschildren's rightshealth careright to healthpublic health managementcomparative lawmedicineReferencesAct to regulate certain activities in connection with arrangements made with a view to women carrying children as surrogate mothers (Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985). URL: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/49. Accessed: 01.02.16.Act to regulate certain activities in connection with arrangements made with a view to women carrying children as surrogate mothers (Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985). URL: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/49. Accessed: 01.02.16.Assisted Human Reproduction Act. URL: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/a-13.4/FullText.html. Accessed: 01.02.16.Assisted Human Reproduction Act. URL: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/a-13.4/FullText.html. Accessed: 01.02.16.Avis de Comité Consultatif de Bioéthique № 30 du 5 juillet 2004 relatif à la gestationpour-autrui. URL: http://www.health.belgium.be. Accessed: 01.02.16.Avis de Comité Consultatif de Bioéthique № 30 du 5 juillet 2004 relatif à la gestationpour-autrui. URL: http://www.health.belgium.be. Accessed: 01.02.16.Banda Vergara A. Dignidad de la persona y reproducción humana asistida. Revista de Derecho. 1998; IX: 7-42.Banda Vergara A. Dignidad de la persona y reproducción humana asistida. Revista de Derecho. 1998; IX: 7-42.Basis of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church. URL: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/419128.html. Accessed: 01.02.16.Basis of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church. URL: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/419128.html. Accessed: 01.02.16.Civil Code of Québec. URL: http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca. Accessed: 01.02.16.Civil Code of Québec. URL: http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca. Accessed: 01.02.16.Code civil de la France. URL: http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr. Accessed: 01.02.16.Code civil de la France. URL: http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr. Accessed: 01.02.16.Code pénal de la France. URL: http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr. Accessed: 01.02.16.Code pénal de la France. URL: http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr. Accessed: 01.02.16.Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction / Report of a meeting on «Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction» held at WHO Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland 17-21 September 2001 / Edited by Effy Vayena, Patrick J. Rowe, P. David Griffin. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction / Report of a meeting on «Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction» held at WHO Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland 17-21 September 2001 / Edited by Effy Vayena, Patrick J. Rowe, P. David Griffin. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.Doe vs. Attorney General / Decision of the Michigan Court of Appeals of 1992 № 487 N.W.2d 484. URL: http://www.leagle.com. Accessed: 01.02.16.Doe vs. Attorney General / Decision of the Michigan Court of Appeals of 1992 № 487 N.W.2d 484. URL: http://www.leagle.com. Accessed: 01.02.16.Gómez de la Torre Vargas M. La fecundación in vitro y la filiación. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Jurídica de Chile, 1993.Gómez de la Torre Vargas M. La fecundación in vitro y la filiación. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Jurídica de Chile, 1993.Loi fédérale sur la procréation médicalement assistée du 18 décembre 1998. URL: http://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classifiedcompilation/20001938/index.html. Accessed: 01.02.16.Loi fédérale sur la procréation médicalement assistée du 18 décembre 1998. URL:New York Domestic Relations. URL: http://law.onecle.com/new-york/domesticrelations/article8.html. Accessed: 01.02.16.http://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classifiedcompilation/20001938/index.html. Accessed: 01.02.16.Surrogacy Act № 2 of 2010. URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au. Accessed: 01.02.16.New York Domestic Relations. URL: http://law.onecle.com/new-york/domesticrelations/article8.html. Accessed: 01.02.16.Surrogacy Act 2010 № 102. URL: http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au. Accessed: 01.02.16.Surrogacy Act № 2 of 2010. URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au. Accessed: 01.02.16.Surrogate parenting Act № 199 of 1988. URL: http://www.legislature.mi.gov. Accessed: 01.02.16.Surrogacy Act 2010 № 102. URL: http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au. Accessed: 01.02.16.Surrogate parenting Act № 199 of 1988. URL: http://www.legislature.mi.gov. Accessed: 01.02.16.Surrogate parenting Act № 199 of 1988. URL: http://www.legislature.mi.gov. Accessed: 01.02.16.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.